Skip to content

SYSTEM SAFETY · PRODUCT SECURITY · CRA READINESS

Are safety and security becoming your bottleneck?

Pictor helps product leaders in regulated industries turn system safety, product security and CRA readiness into a clear, traceable path — from first architecture to final audit.

Does the CRA apply to your product?

  • Check your scope
  • Get the full PDF
  • No signup required

WHERE TO START

Three routes into the work.

Each route begins with the same question: what has to hold up under review, and what evidence proves it?

01

System Safety

Structure risk, requirements, architecture and verification across safety-critical programmes.

Explore System Safety

02

CRA Consulting

Turn the Cyber Resilience Act into a practical engineering plan, clear ownership and defensible evidence.

Explore CRA Consulting

03

Embedded Systems Expertise

Strengthen architecture and lifecycle decisions in complex, high-availability and safety-critical systems.

See our background

TRACEABILITY

One line from scope to evidence.

Pictor keeps risk, architecture decisions and verification connected, so the argument holds under review.

  1. 01

    Scope

    Product, programme, roles and applicable requirements.

  2. 02

    Risk

    Safety hazards, cybersecurity risks and prioritisation.

  3. 03

    Architecture

    Requirements, design decisions and mitigations.

  4. 04

    Verification

    Reviews, tests, actions and acceptance criteria.

  5. 05

    Evidence

    Traceable records, technical documentation and decision rationale.

EVIDENCEENGINEERINGRISK

WHEN ORGANISATIONS CALL

Three recurring situations.

Most engagements start in one of these, and widen once the evidence chain is visible.

A critical capacity gap

A senior safety or compliance role needs to be filled quickly without losing momentum.

New obligations meet an existing product lifecycle

CRA requirements must be translated into real engineering, documentation and post-market processes.

Evidence is fragmented across teams and tools

Risk, architecture, decisions and verification need a defensible line of traceability.

RESEARCH BACKGROUND

European programmes behind the practice.

Assurance, modelling and safe cooperation between connected systems — applied research that informs how we structure evidence.

All projects

ITEA

BUMBLE

Blended modelling for cross-disciplinary software and systems engineering.

CELTIC-NEXT

Health5G

5G-enabled healthcare use cases across hospital, home and emergency environments.

ECSEL

SafeCOP

Safe and secure cooperation of cyber-physical systems.

ECSEL

AMASS

An assurance and certification platform for cyber-physical systems.

RISK · ENGINEERING · EVIDENCE

Three layers, one traceable line.

The Pictor symbol is how we work. Risk at the base, engineering decisions in the middle, evidence at the signal layer — each one carrying the one above it.

RISK

Risk, understood before it is argued

We start where the consequences are: hazards, threats and the operating context. Risk work that is explicit enough to steer design decisions, not a document produced after the fact.

  • Hazard analysis and threat modelling in the same frame
  • Severity, exposure and controllability made traceable
  • Residual risk stated in language a decision-maker can act on
System safety practice

ENGINEERING

Engineering decisions that hold up

Requirements, architecture and verification treated as one chain. Safety and security requirements are allocated to real components, with rationale kept where the design lives.

  • Requirement allocation across hardware, software and operations
  • Architecture reviews with safety and security in the same room
  • Verification strategy defined together with the requirement
Expertise areas

EVIDENCE

Evidence a regulator or customer can follow

The signal layer: an assurance case where every claim resolves to an argument and an artefact. Structured so an auditor, a notified body or a customer can walk the same path you did.

  • Assurance cases linked claim-to-artefact
  • Conformity documentation prepared for external review
  • Post-market and reporting processes that stay current
Check your CRA scope

Regulatory interpretation

CRA, machinery, medical and automotive frameworks translated into concrete engineering obligations — with the reasoning kept visible.

Assurance leadership

Interim safety and security management: cadence, review gates and the authority to make evidence part of the plan rather than the aftermath.

Capability transfer

Methods, templates and review habits handed over to your own teams, so the practice continues after the engagement ends.

CRA SCOPE CHECKER

Does the CRA apply to your product?

Enter your website. We read what you make and sell, then ask only the few questions the regulation turns on.

About 60 seconds. No account. PDF report on request.

INSIGHT

CRA reporting obligations begin 11 September 2026. Is your product organisation operationally ready?

  • 11 September 2026
  • Reporting obligations
  • Post-market processes